If you, a family member or friend has had a pet affected by Sportsmix pet foods, contact Mr. Newman by calling or texting 860.996.8523 to know your legal rights and remedies.
]]>Who are the most likely candidates for a refinance? The list is lengthy: those who want to lower their monthly housing payment, anyone with two mortgages who may want to combine their loan into one mortgage, those who think they may be eligible to eliminate their PMI (private mortgage insurance), or even those who wish to use their equity to take some cash out for a home addition, tuition payments, or other expenses that would otherwise have to be borrowed at a higher interest rate. You will also need to factor in the closing costs, which can often be added into the loan amount, but its always worth shopping around to compare closing costs. The costs can vary widely, as can the customer service that you receive. It is almost always best to have an actual loan originator working on your file, as opposed to filing an online application. That way, if any problems arise, you have a person to call who has a vested interest in addressing the issue in a timely manner.
For most people, their home is their biggest investment and paying for it is one of the longest term financial commitments they make. Make sure you are not overlooking an opportunity to save money for decades to come.
The real estate department at Brown Paindiris & Scott, LLP has the experience you need to help you streamline the refinance process so you do not miss out on this opportunity.
]]>If you, a family member or friend has a pet affected by these foods, contact Mr. Newman at 860.583.5200 to know your legal rights and remedies.
]]>"any health care professional or health care facility shall be immune from suit for civil liability for any injury or death alleged to have been sustained because of the individual's or health care facility's acts or omissions undertaken in good faith while providing health care services in support of the State's COVID-19 response, including but not limited to acts or omissions undertaken because of a lack of resources, attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, that renders the health care professional or health care facility unable to provide the level or manner of care that otherwise would have been required in the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic and which resulted in the damages at issue..."
The bounds of what can be considered "good faith" to provide nursing homes with a shield against lawsuits during the current pandemic have not yet been tested in court. Department of Public Health citations and/or sanctions would presumably be evidence that a given facility did not act in "good faith." If you have questions about the standards of care for a loved one or family member who is presently in a facility, feel free to contact Attorney Bruce Newman at 860.583.5200.
]]>STEP 1:
STEP 2 :
The information you gather at the accident scene will assist the insurance claim process. Although the police gather much of this information, their reports are often not immediately available following an accident. It is very helpful if you can obtain:
STEP 3:
STEP 4:
Additional considerations:
The experienced attorneys at Brown Paindiris & Scott are here to assist you every step of the way.
]]>Normally, one first hears about HAVEN from a mandatory reporter, such as a colleague or fellow members of one's profession. Mandatory reporters in many situations can fulfill their legal obligation by reporting such an individual to HAVEN (860-828-3175) in lieu of reporting them to the Connecticut Department of Public Health. The big difference is in confidentiality. If one is admitted into the HAVEN program, both an initial fee and a monthly fee are imposed, in part, based upon ability to pay. Some of the more common reasons a matter is referred to HAVEN are substance abuse issues such as alcohol, prescription drugs (legal pain killers), as well as illicit drugs. While a matter may be referred to HAVEN initially, one could transfer the matter to the Connecticut Department of Public Health, DPH, where procedures can be made public. The manner in which the referral is handled differs in part between HAVEN and DPH in terms of setting up monitoring a program for dealing with one's physical or mental health treatment. It is important that you learn the difference between the two programs in order to make an informed decision; the legal consequences can remain with you for a lifetime. Additionally, the cost and expenses vary significantly between the two programs. The length of time one must spend in such a program also varies in terms of years.
It is submitted that your healthcare license is a valuable property right and privilege; how one handles this intervention with these two alternative programs may affect long term one's professional career. Seeking out the services of an experienced attorney is a smart first move in helping navigate through these rough waters. The experienced attorneys at Brown Paindiris & Scott are here to assist you every step of the way.
]]>A Probate Court has no discretion to appoint someone other than the person named in the Will. Testators are entitled to select their own executors, and those persons may not be rejected unless excluded by common law or statute. "(i)f no person has been designated in a will to be executor, or if the person designated ... has died or refuses to accept or is incapable of accepting such trust, and no alternative or successor has been named the court shall admit the administration of the estate..." Conn. Gen. Stat. Sect. 45a-290(a) (2018).
Challenges to Probate Court appointment of designated fiduciaries have been strictly construed in Connecticut Courts. The cases have long held that the executor is the creature of
the testator and that the courts may not ignore the designation of the executor except in those instances provided by law.
An executor or administrator has a fiduciary duty to the estate and must not act out of self- interest or for the interests of parties other than the heirs, distributees, and creditors of the estate. An important aspect of an executor's fiduciary responsibility is to maintain an undivided loyalty to the estate. "(One interested in an estate has the right to have its representative wholly free from conflicting personal interests." Ramsdell v. Union Tr. Co., 202 Conn.57, 65 (1987).
In summary, as a general rule testators are entitled to select their own executors. The court may refuse to appoint a designated executor only if the chosen person is disqualified by law from serving in that capacity, if the individual is incapacitated, a minor, or a corporation whose charter does not include trust powers.
]]>You will find your coverage on the "declarations" page of your policy. Connecticut requires a minimum of $25,000.00 per person and $50,000.00 per accident for bodily injury liability. Sometimes, this is reflected as "$25,000/$50,000" on the declarations pages. These are referred to as "split limits". With those limits, if you injure someone your insurer will pay up to $25k for that person's "bodily injury." If you injure two people, your insurer will pay up to $25k per person, but no more than $50k in total for that accident. Anything beyond that you may be responsible out-of-pocket.
You may also purchase what is called "single limit" coverage, for example in the amount of $300,000.00. In this scenario, only $300,000.00 is available for any and all bodily injuries claimed in a particular accident that you cause.
I often recommend that my clients purchase a minimum of $300k per person in bodily injury coverage to protect themselves from any out of pocket exposure. But, no one can predict the future and at the end of the day it's an odds game. Other factors are important as well: age of the driver on the policy; aggressiveness of driver on the policy; personal assets; miles driven; etc.... You can purchase any number of different dollar amount coverages, as long as it meets the State minimums. Thus, if you are worried about a particular operator, then you should purchase more in coverage.
Underinsured/Uninsured coverage means exactly what it sounds like. If an individual hits you and that individual only has, for example, the minimum coverage of $25k/$50k, but your damages amount to more than $25k, then the individual that hit you is "underinsured". If they did not have any insurance at the time of the accident, then they are "uninsured". At that point in time, your "underinsured/uninsured" coverage kicks in and attempts to make you whole, as if your own policy was possessed by the individual that hit you.
Typically, this underinsured/uninsured coverage matches your underlying coverage (e.g. $25k/$50k underlying coverage, and $25k/$50k underinsured uninsured coverage). Though, you can customize your underinsured/uninsured coverage as well. Underinsured/uninsured coverage is mandatory in Connecticut and is automatic with your general underlying coverage purchase.
Now, because the goal is to protect you up to the point you were willing to protect yourself, you generally cannot add your underinsured coverage to the payment made by the policy of the individual that hit you. Rather, your own insurer/policy gets a credit for payment made on behalf of the policy holder that hit you. By way of example, assume you sustained $125k in bodily injuries in an accident, and only hold $100k in underinsured coverage. If the individual that hit you had only $25k in coverage, they pay their $25k and are considered underinsured. Here, your policy does not simply pay the full $100k in underinsured coverage, but only pays $75k; again, because the $25k and the $75k puts you in the same position as if the person that hit you held what you held in coverage. That is called "non-conversion" underinsured coverage. Put differently, your policy gets a credit for what was paid out of the policy that hit you.
However, if you decide to purchase what is called "conversion" coverage, then your policy does not get the benefit of the monies paid out on the policy that hit you. In this scenario, you would get $25k from the person that hit you, and your full $100k underinsured coverage. You are entitled to that because you purchased that conversion option on your policy. As you can see, this has the potential to make a significant difference should you be found in such a precarious situation. Unfortunately, some of my clients have not been made whole due to limited coverage on the liable policy, and due to not having conversion coverage (or insufficient underinsured coverage) on their own policy.
This is only the tip of the iceberg, but it is the bare minimum of what you should be aware of when it comes to your policy and options you can purchase. Medical payment coverage and umbrella coverage were not covered in this article, but are additional options you can purchase to protect yourself.
If you are injured in a motor vehicle accident and are worried that the individual that hit you does not have enough coverage to compensate your for your injuries, pain and suffering, do not hesitate to call Attorney Sobin for a complete review.
]]>The need to address Medicaid/Title 19 and other Elder Law issues continues, often in heightened ways during this crisis, and the transition to remote work status for state employees in agencies that deal with these needs has increased the obstacles and delays for folks needing assistance. It is best not to wait to address these issues as they may take more time to resolve with current limitations and restrictions.
With heightened awareness of mortality risks increased by the current medical crisis and more time to consider and discuss goals and aspirations with family members, you may realize that a plan should be put in place, or an existing plan be updated. You or family members may need to address Medicaid or Elder Law issues. We caution folks not to procrastinate their estate planning or elder law needs during this difficult time. We have the capability and desire to address and assist in resolving those needs despite the physical barriers that may exist - most of which can be overcome with existing tools.
For those with substantial assets that may be exposed to taxation, it is important to consider the potential for significant changes to tax structures - income, gift, and estate taxes, at both the federal and state level. The possibility of a change in administrations in Washington always increases the likelihood of changes in taxes, but that likelihood is particularly high in the current political environment, in the setting of large financial burdens shouldered by the nation to mitigate the effects of the COVID pandemic with reduced cash receipts resulting from a struggling economy. Although it is impossible to predict what tax changes will occur, economists and tax advisers have identified several possible changes that would affect families with substantial assets, and may be reasons to consider taking steps before the end of this calendar year.
The existing federal estate and gift tax exclusion is just over $11.5 Million Dollars for an individual (scheduled to return to $5 Million in 2026 if no legislation changes it before then). On the federal level, an individual can therefore make a gift of up to $11.5 Million Dollars without incurring a gift tax or triggering a later estate tax. It must be noted, however, that the state exemption is less than half this amount and thus a state gift tax would apply for gifts exceeding $5.1 Million Dollars for an individual. The IRS has issued a regulation providing that if a gift is made while the exclusion remains at $11.5 Million, the gift will remain excluded from gift and estate tax even if the exclusion is reduced by Congress in the future. Many advisors believe a new administration may lead Congress to reduce the exclusion, perhaps retroactive to the beginning of 2021. A large gift before the end of this calendar year would lock in the higher exclusion for your estate even if the exclusion is reduced thereafter. This planning would have to be completed before the effective date of any future change, which some predict could be as early as January 1st of 2021.
Another tax change that has been discussed for a long time and could be adopted, in whole or in part, with a change in Washington, involves changing the basis for income tax purposes of certain assets inherited at death. Under long-existing law basis, for most assets, is stepped up or down at death to equal its then fair market value. This eliminates income tax on all appreciated value for a beneficiary who sells after inheriting an asset. Families have used this concept to transfer wealth to younger family members while minimizing income taxation for generations. If you own an asset that you expect to increase substantially in value in the future, and if the "step up" rules are changed, it may be advisable to make an irrevocable gift, to an individual or to a trust, to effectively transfer future appreciation out of your taxable estate since the income tax benefit of holding the appreciated asset until death would be lost or reduced.
If you wish to explore any of your estate planning or elder law needs, we welcome you to contact your BPSLawyer.
]]>In order to enjoy creditor protection, the trust must satisfy certain requirements, including: 1. Being irrevocable; 2. Incorporate Connecticut law as to its validity and administration; 3. Contain a spendthrift clause; and 4. Use a "qualified trustee". The first three requirements are easily addressed, but the "qualified trustee" requires greater consideration. A "qualified trustee" is either an individual residing in Connecticut or an entity authorized by Connecticut law to act as a trustee. In addition, this "qualified trustee" must maintain or arrange for the custody of the trust assets; attend to filing all tax returns; maintain records of the trust; and materially participate in the administration of the trust. Also, the trustee would not be the individual establishing the trust nor a related or subordinate party. However, the individual establishing the trust can reserve the power to remove and appoint trustees, provided such trustees are not related or subordinate parties.
There are some limits to the creditor protection. It is worth noting that certain claims can still be enforced against a DAPT, including: 1. Tort claims arising prior to the establishment of the trust; 2. Marital support obligations; 3. Fraudulent transfer claims; and 4. Child support obligations. Finally, claims are subject to a four year statute of limitations period.
Connecticut now offers an interesting opportunity for individuals concerned with creditor protection to establish trusts to protect themselves and their loved ones, while reserving certain beneficial enjoyment. When you consult with the attorneys of Brown, Paindiris & Scott, LLP for your estate planning needs, we can evaluate the usefulness of this technique.
]]>